Agentic AI refers to artificial intelligence systems that can work autonomously to achieve goals, rather than just responding to direct commands. Think of it as the difference between a helpful assistant who waits for specific instructions versus one who can take initiative and figure out the best way to complete a task on their own.

Traditional AI systems are like very smart calculators - they process information and give you answers when asked. Agentic AI, however, is more like having a capable colleague who can understand your broader objectives, make decisions, and take actions to reach those goals without constant supervision.

These systems can:

Plan and strategise how to approach complex problems

Make decisions when faced with multiple options

Take actions in digital environments (like booking appointments, conducting research, or managing workflows)

Learn and adapt their approach based on results

Interact with other systems and tools to accomplish tasks

Organizations considering agentic AI implementation need a structured assessment approach that goes beyond traditional technology evaluations. Here's a comprehensive SWOT framework tailored for agentic AI readiness:

Strengths Assessment: Evaluate current digital infrastructure, data quality, and workforce technical literacy. Examine existing automation processes, decision-making frameworks, and organizational agility. Assess leadership's comfort with autonomous systems and existing AI/ML capabilities.

Weaknesses Analysis: Identify gaps in data governance, cybersecurity protocols, and change management capabilities. Examine resistance to autonomous decision-making, unclear accountability structures, and insufficient technical talent. Review regulatory compliance frameworks and risk management maturity.

Opportunities Evaluation: Map potential use cases across departments - customer service, operations, strategic planning, and routine task automation. Quantify efficiency gains, cost reduction potential, and competitive advantages. Assess market positioning opportunities and innovation potential.

Threats Consideration: Analyze job displacement concerns, ethical implications, and potential system failures. Evaluate competitor advantages, regulatory changes, and data privacy risks. Consider vendor lock-in scenarios and technology obsolescence.

Implementation Methodology: Conduct stakeholder interviews, technical audits, and pilot program assessments. Use scoring matrices for each SWOT element, create risk-benefit analyses, and develop phased implementation roadmaps. Regular reassessment ensures alignment with evolving organizational capabilities and market conditions.

It is latin for ‘We strive’. A founding pillar of Salveus it that we will strive to improve outcomes for our clients in a smart, sustainable and ethical manner; building long-term relationships based on shared values and mutual respect.

Our services - SLG3, Principled Futures Advisory and Collyer & Co, all have their own pricing emthodology. If you’re interested in finding our more, simply contact us and we’ll send you a summary of the services and likely costs.

Our Head Office is in London, our team work in various parts of the UK and we work with clients around the world.

Yes, our SLG methodology is able to be utilised by multi-academy trusts to provide an external, expert assessment of the combined performance of their strategy, leadership and governance. This process has evolved from extensive experience and practice as a National Leader of Governance for the Department of Education.